National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
Topics
- Ambulatory Care and Surgery (1)
- Cancer (6)
- Cancer: Colorectal Cancer (2)
- (-) Cancer: Lung Cancer (10)
- Cancer: Prostate Cancer (1)
- Case Study (1)
- COVID-19 (1)
- (-) Diagnostic Safety and Quality (10)
- Disparities (1)
- Elderly (1)
- Electronic Health Records (EHRs) (2)
- Guidelines (1)
- Health Information Technology (HIT) (2)
- Imaging (2)
- Policy (1)
- Quality Measures (1)
- Quality of Care (1)
- Racial and Ethnic Minorities (1)
- Respiratory Conditions (1)
- Risk (1)
- Shared Decision Making (1)
- Surgery (1)
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 10 of 10 Research Studies DisplayedBonner SN, Lagisetty K, Reddy RM
Clinical implications of removing race-corrected pulmonary function tests for African American patients requiring surgery for lung cancer.
This study’s objective was to identify how many hospitals providing lung cancer surgery use race correction in pulmonary function tests (PFTs), examine the association of race correction with predicted lung function, and test the effect of decorrection on surgeons' treatment recommendations. Percent predicted preoperative and postoperative forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) was calculated for African American patients who underwent lung cancer resection between January 1, 2015, and September 31, 2022, using race-corrected and race-neutral equations for hospitals performing race correction. Randomization of US cardiothoracic surgeons was conducted to receive 1 clinical vignette that differed by the use of Global Lung Function Initiative equations for (1) African American patients (percent predicted postoperative FEV1, 49%), (2) other race or multiracial patients (percent predicted postoperative FEV1, 45%), and (3) race-neutral patients (percent predicted postoperative FEV1, 42%). A total of 515 African American patients (308 [59.8%] female; mean age, 66.2 years) were included in the study. Among these patients, the percent predicted preoperative FEV1 and postoperative FEV1 would have decreased by 9.2% and 7.6%, respectively, if race-neutral equations had been used. A total of 225 surgeons (194 male [87.8%]; mean time in practice, 19.4 years) were successfully randomized and completed the vignette items regarding risk perception and treatment outcomes (76% completion rate). Surgeons randomized to the vignette with African American race-corrected PFTs were more likely to recommend lobectomy (79.2%) compared with surgeons randomized to the other race or multiracial-corrected (61.7%) or race-neutral PFTs (52.8%).
AHRQ-funded; HS028038.
Citation: Bonner SN, Lagisetty K, Reddy RM .
Clinical implications of removing race-corrected pulmonary function tests for African American patients requiring surgery for lung cancer.
JAMA Surg 2023 Oct; 158(10):1061-68. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.3239..
Keywords: Racial and Ethnic Minorities, Cancer: Lung Cancer, Cancer, Surgery, Diagnostic Safety and Quality
Murphy DR, Zimolzak AJ, Upadhyay DK
Developing electronic clinical quality measures to assess the cancer diagnostic process.
Electronic clinical quality measures (eCQMs) to evaluate quality of cancer diagnosis could facilitate quantification and improvement of diagnostic performance. The purpose of this study was to developed 2 eCQMs to evaluate diagnostic assessment of red-flag clinical findings for colorectal cancer (CRC) and lung cancer. At each site the researchers assessed 100 positive and 20 negative randomly chosen records for each eCQM at each site to validate accuracy and categorized missed opportunities associated with system, provider, or patient factors. The researchers applied the CRC eCQM at both sites, while the lung cancer eCQM was only applied at the VA due to an absence of structured data indicating level of cancer suspicion on most chest imaging results at Geisinger. The study found that for the CRC eCQM, the appropriate follow-up took place in 26, 746 out of 74, 314 patients (36.0%) in the VA after removing clinical exclusions and in 1,009 out of 2,461 patients (41.1%) at Geisinger. The appropriate assessment for lung cancer in the VA took place in 25, 166 out of 40, 924 patients (61.5). Provider factors were cited by reviewers the primary source of missed opportunities at both sites.
AHRQ-funded; HS022087.
Citation: Murphy DR, Zimolzak AJ, Upadhyay DK .
Developing electronic clinical quality measures to assess the cancer diagnostic process.
J Am Med Inform Assoc 2023 Aug 18; 30(9):1526-31. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocad089..
Keywords: Cancer: Lung Cancer, Cancer, Quality Measures, Diagnostic Safety and Quality, Quality of Care
Shipe ME, Haddad DN, Deppen SA
Modeling the impact of delaying the diagnosis of non-small cell lung cancer during COVID-19
The novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic has led surgical societies to recommend delaying diagnosis and treatment of suspected lung cancer for lesions less than 2 cm. The COVID-19 infection rate at which immediate operative risk exceeds benefit is unknown. Delaying diagnosis can lead to disease progression, but the impact of this delay on mortality is unknown. In this study, the investigators sought to model immediate versus delayed surgical resection in a suspicious lung nodule less than 2 cm.
AHRQ-funded; HS026122.
Citation: Shipe ME, Haddad DN, Deppen SA .
Modeling the impact of delaying the diagnosis of non-small cell lung cancer during COVID-19
Ann Thorac Surg 2021 Jul;112(1):248-54. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.08.025..
Keywords: COVID-19, Cancer: Lung Cancer, Cancer, Diagnostic Safety and Quality, Case Study, Risk
Emani S, Sequist TD, Lacson R
Ambulatory safety nets to reduce missed and delayed diagnoses of cancer.
An ambulatory safety net (ASN) is an innovative organizational intervention for addressing patient safety related to missed and delayed diagnoses of abnormal test results. ASNs consist of a set of tools, reports and registries, and associated work flows to create a high-reliability system for abnormal test result management. In this paper, two ASNs implemented at an academic medical center are described, one focusing on colon cancer and the other on lung cancer.
AHRQ-funded; HS024722.
Citation: Emani S, Sequist TD, Lacson R .
Ambulatory safety nets to reduce missed and delayed diagnoses of cancer.
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2019 Aug;45(8):552-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2019.05.010.
.
.
Keywords: Cancer, Diagnostic Safety and Quality, Cancer: Lung Cancer, Cancer: Colorectal Cancer, Ambulatory Care and Surgery
Meyer AND, Singh H
Calibrating how doctors think and seek information to minimise errors in diagnosis.
This editorial discusses a study by Sheringham et al., published in 2017 in BMJ Quality and Safety, and entitled “Variations in GPs’ decisions to investigate suspected lung cancer: a factorial experiment using multimedia vignettes” in which they used simulated patient vignettes to understand the role that patient characteristics (including demographics and symptomatology) play in physicians’ decisions to investigate for possible diagnosis of lung cancer.
AHRQ-funded; HS022087; HS023602.
Citation: Meyer AND, Singh H .
Calibrating how doctors think and seek information to minimise errors in diagnosis.
BMJ Qual Saf 2017 Jun;26(6):436-38. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2016-006071..
Keywords: Cancer: Lung Cancer, Shared Decision Making, Diagnostic Safety and Quality
Nadpara P, Madhavan SS, Tworek C
Guideline-concordant timely lung cancer care and prognosis among elderly patients in the United States: a population-based study.
This study evaluated the variations in guideline-concordant timely lung cancer care and prognosis among elderly in the US. It found that the time to diagnosis and treatment varied significantly among the elderly. However, 77.5 percent received guideline-concordant timely lung cancer care. The likelihood of receiving timely care significantly decreased with early stage diagnosis, increasing age, non-white race, higher comorbidity score, and lower income.
AHRQ-funded; HS018622.
Citation: Nadpara P, Madhavan SS, Tworek C .
Guideline-concordant timely lung cancer care and prognosis among elderly patients in the United States: a population-based study.
Cancer Epidemiol 2015 Dec;39(6):1136-44. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2015.06.005.
.
.
Keywords: Cancer: Lung Cancer, Elderly, Guidelines, Disparities, Diagnostic Safety and Quality
Murphy DR, Wu L, Thomas EJ
Electronic trigger-based intervention to reduce delays in diagnostic evaluation for cancer: a cluster randomized controlled trial.
The researchers tested whether prospective use of electronic health record-based trigger algorithms to identify patients at risk of diagnostic delays could prevent delays in diagnostic evaluation for cancer. They found that electronic trigger-based interventions seem to be effective in reducing time to diagnostic evaluation of colorectal and prostate cancer as well as improving the proportion of patients who receive follow-up.
AHRQ-funded; HS017820.
Citation: Murphy DR, Wu L, Thomas EJ .
Electronic trigger-based intervention to reduce delays in diagnostic evaluation for cancer: a cluster randomized controlled trial.
J Clin Oncol 2015 Nov 1;33(31):3560-7. doi: 10.1200/jco.2015.61.1301..
Keywords: Cancer: Colorectal Cancer, Cancer: Lung Cancer, Cancer: Prostate Cancer, Diagnostic Safety and Quality, Electronic Health Records (EHRs), Health Information Technology (HIT)
Murphy DR, Thomas EJ, Meyer AN
Development and validation of electronic health record-based triggers to detect delays in follow-up of abnormal lung imaging findings.
In this study, the researchers developed an electronic health record (EHR)-based trigger algorithm to identify delays in follow-up evaluation of patients with imaging findings suggestive of lung cancer. After validating the trigger with retrospective data, they concluded that EHR-based triggers can be used to identify patients with suspicious imaging findings in whom follow-up diagnostic evaluation was delayed.
AHRQ-funded; HS017820.
Citation: Murphy DR, Thomas EJ, Meyer AN .
Development and validation of electronic health record-based triggers to detect delays in follow-up of abnormal lung imaging findings.
Radiology 2015 Oct;277(1):81-7. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2015142530..
Keywords: Cancer: Lung Cancer, Diagnostic Safety and Quality, Electronic Health Records (EHRs), Health Information Technology (HIT), Imaging
Gerber DE, Laccetti AL, Xuan L
Impact of prior cancer on eligibility for lung cancer clinical trials.
A prior cancer diagnosis often excludes patients from cancer clinical trials. Lung cancer patients were used to determine estimated impact on trial accrual. This study found that patients previously diagnosed with cancer were excluded in more than two-thirds of lung cancer trials. More research is needed to understand the basis of this policy.
AHRQ-funded; HS022418
Citation: Gerber DE, Laccetti AL, Xuan L .
Impact of prior cancer on eligibility for lung cancer clinical trials.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014 Nov;106(11). doi: 10.1093/jnci/dju302..
Keywords: Cancer: Lung Cancer, Policy, Cancer, Diagnostic Safety and Quality
Deppen SA, Blume JD, Kensinger CD
Accuracy of FDG-PET to diagnose lung cancer in areas with infectious lung disease: a meta-analysis.
The purpose of this study was to estimate the diagnostic accuracy of positron emission tomography (PET) combined with fludeoxyglucose F18 (FDG) for pulmonary modules suspicious for lung cancer in regions where infectious lung disease is endemic and compare the accuracy in regions where such disease is rare. It found that the accuracy of FDG-PET was extremely heterogeneous.
AHRQ-funded; HS021554.
Citation: Deppen SA, Blume JD, Kensinger CD .
Accuracy of FDG-PET to diagnose lung cancer in areas with infectious lung disease: a meta-analysis.
JAMA 2014 Sep 24;312(12):1227-36. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.11488..
Keywords: Cancer, Cancer: Lung Cancer, Diagnostic Safety and Quality, Respiratory Conditions, Imaging