National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
Topics
- Ambulatory Care and Surgery (2)
- Care Coordination (1)
- Case Study (1)
- Chronic Conditions (1)
- Data (1)
- Diabetes (1)
- Disparities (2)
- Electronic Health Records (EHRs) (1)
- Evidence-Based Practice (2)
- (-) Healthcare Delivery (37)
- Health Information Technology (HIT) (3)
- Health Insurance (1)
- Health Services Research (HSR) (2)
- (-) Health Systems (37)
- Hospitals (4)
- Implementation (4)
- Learning Health Systems (6)
- Medicaid (1)
- Medicare (2)
- Organizational Change (2)
- Outcomes (1)
- Patient-Centered Healthcare (3)
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research (1)
- Patient and Family Engagement (2)
- Patient Experience (1)
- Patient Safety (1)
- Payment (2)
- Policy (1)
- Practice Patterns (1)
- Primary Care (5)
- Primary Care: Models of Care (1)
- Provider (1)
- Provider: Physician (1)
- Provider Performance (2)
- Quality Improvement (2)
- Quality Indicators (QIs) (1)
- Quality Measures (2)
- Quality of Care (6)
- Research Methodologies (1)
- Rural Health (1)
- Shared Decision Making (1)
- Social Determinants of Health (1)
- System Design (2)
- Vaccination (1)
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 25 of 37 Research Studies DisplayedChisolm DJ, Dugan JA, Figueroa JF
Improving health equity through health care systems research.
This study’s objective was to describe health equity research priorities for health care delivery systems and delineate a research and action agenda that generates evidence-based solutions to persistent racial and ethnic inequities in health outcomes. This project was conducted as a component of the AHRQ stakeholder engaged process to develop an Equity Agenda and Action Plan to guide priority setting to advance health equity. The stakeholders included experts from academia, health care organizations, industry, and government. Five priority themes were derived iteratively through experts from academia, health care organizations, industry, and government. They identified six priority themes for research; (1) institutional leadership, culture, and workforce; (2) data-driven, culturally tailored care; (3) health equity targeted performance incentives; (4) health equity-informed approaches to health system consolidation and access; (5) whole person care; (6) and whole community investment. They also suggested cross-cutting themes regarding research workforce and research timelines.
AHRQ-funded.
Citation: Chisolm DJ, Dugan JA, Figueroa JF .
Improving health equity through health care systems research.
Health Serv Res 2023 Dec; 58(suppl 3):289-99. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14192..
Keywords: Health Systems, Disparities, Social Determinants of Health, Healthcare Delivery
Johnson PT, Conway SJ, Berkowitz SA
Transforming health care from volume to value: a health system implementation road map.
The mission of the High Value Practice Academic Alliance is to 1) rapidly disseminate effective value-based performance improvement processes to safely decrease the cost of care for patients, and 2) train the next generation of physicians in principles of high value practice. The organization convened 100 academic medical center partners, and after 5 years of practice, opened membership to any medical center and became the High Value Practice Alliance. In 2021 and 2022, directors of the alliance devoted educational programs of the annual conference to developing a care delivery roadmap identifying the strategies and programs required to maximize resource use, clinical effectiveness, and care coordination. The group is now publishing the “playbook” as a series of focused articles, a comprehensive framework to improve the health care value in a delivery system. This playbook includes 3 performance improvement approaches: 1) resource focused, 2) infrastructure focused, and 3) condition focused. The Transforming Healthcare from Volume to Value: a Health System Implementation RoadMap manuscript series will address each of the strategies and relevant programs.
AHRQ-funded; HS029151; HS026350.
Citation: Johnson PT, Conway SJ, Berkowitz SA .
Transforming health care from volume to value: a health system implementation road map.
Am J Med 2023 Aug; 136(8):763-67. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2023.04.030..
Keywords: Health Systems, Implementation, Healthcare Delivery
Beaulieu ND, Chernew ME, McWilliams JM
Organization and performance of US health systems.
The objectives of this evidence review were to identify and describe health systems in the US, to assess differences between physicians and hospitals in and outside of health systems, and to compare quality and cost of care delivered by physicians and hospitals in and outside of health systems. A total of 580 health systems in a great variety of sizes were identified; prices for physician, hospital services, and total spending were assessed in 2018 commercial claims data. Health system physicians and hospitals were shown to deliver a large portion of medical services. Clinical quality performance and patient experience measures were slightly better in systems; however, spending and prices were significantly higher, especially in small practices. The authors concluded that slight quality differentials in combination with large price differentials suggested that health systems have not realized their potential for better care at equal or lower cost.
AHRQ-funded; HS024072.
Citation: Beaulieu ND, Chernew ME, McWilliams JM .
Organization and performance of US health systems.
JAMA 2023 Jan 24; 329(4):325-35. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.24032..
Keywords: Health Systems, Healthcare Delivery, Provider Performance, Quality Measures, Quality of Care, Hospitals
Sherry TB, Damberg CL, DeYoreo M
Is bigger better?: A closer look at small health systems in the United States.
The purpose of this study was to expand existing health systems research by comparing the features, cost, and quality of care in small U.S. health care systems with those of large U.S. health systems. In this retrospective study with a repeated cross-sectional analysis, the researchers evaluated between 468 and 479 large health systems and between 608 and 641 small health systems serving fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries, yearly between the year of 2013 and 2017. The study found that small systems had a larger share of beneficiaries and practice sites in small towns or rural areas, performance quality was lower in small systems that in large systems, and there was no difference in total cost of care. The study concluded that the quality of care in small systems is lower than large systems, but small systems provide care for rural Medicare populations. The researchers recommended that future research should explore the reasons for why these differences exist in quality.
AHRQ-funded; HS024067.
Citation: Sherry TB, Damberg CL, DeYoreo M .
Is bigger better?: A closer look at small health systems in the United States.
Med Care 2022 Jul;60(7):504-11. doi: 10.1097/mlr.0000000000001727..
Keywords: Health Systems, Medicaid, Healthcare Delivery
Bierman AS, Tong ST, McNellis RJ
AHRQ Author: Bierman AS, Tong ST, McNellis RJ
Realizing the dream: the future of primary care research.
In this article, the authors discussed the primary care research central to successful primary care transformation and to realizing the vision of a high-performing US health system to serve effectively all Americans and their communities while advancing health equity.
AHRQ-authored.
Citation: Bierman AS, Tong ST, McNellis RJ .
Realizing the dream: the future of primary care research.
Ann Fam Med 2022 Mar-Apr;20(2):170-74. doi: 10.1370/afm.2788..
Keywords: Primary Care, Healthcare Delivery, Evidence-Based Practice, Health Systems, Learning Health Systems, Patient-Centered Healthcare
Henriksen K, Rodrick D, Grace EN
AHRQ Author: Henriksen K, Rodrick D, Grace EN, Shofer M, Brady, JP
Pursuing patient safety at the intersection of design, systems engineering, and health care delivery research: an ongoing assessment.
This article describes a grant initiative undertaken by AHRQ that brings design, systems engineering, and health care delivery research together to test new ideas that could make health care safer. Based on feedback received from project teams, lessons learned are emerging that find considerable variation among project teams in deploying the methodology and a longer-than-anticipated amount of time in bringing team members from different disciplines together where they learn to communicate and function as a team. Three narratives are generated in terms of what success might look like.
AHRQ-authored.
Citation: Henriksen K, Rodrick D, Grace EN .
Pursuing patient safety at the intersection of design, systems engineering, and health care delivery research: an ongoing assessment.
J Patient Saf 2021 Dec 1;17(8):e1685-e90. doi: 10.1097/pts.0000000000000577..
Keywords: Patient Safety, Healthcare Delivery, Learning Health Systems, Health Systems
Baskin AS, Wang T, Miller J
A health systems ethical framework for de-implementation in health care.
De-implementation is the ethical obligation to eliminate health care practices which are unnecessary, lacking in evidence, harmful, and/ or prevent the spending of resources on more beneficial services. The purpose of this study was to apply Krubiner and Hyder’s bioethical framework for health systems activity to the analysis of de-implementation ethics in the broader context of health care systems. The focus was specifically on ethics principles relevant to de-implementation which serve to call for or facilitate low value surgery. The authors identified the 5 health systems principles from Krubiner and Hyder’s 11 most relevant to the topic of de-implementation. These included: evidence and effectiveness, transparency and public engagement, efficiency, responsiveness, and collaboration. The study concluded that a health-systems framework allows for consideration of the factors which impact de-implementation, and gives providers to ability to think about new ways to address barriers to the reduction of low-value care.
AHRQ-funded; HS026030.
Citation: Baskin AS, Wang T, Miller J .
A health systems ethical framework for de-implementation in health care.
J Surg Res 2021 Nov;267:151-58. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2021.05.006..
Keywords: Health Systems, Healthcare Delivery
Kandel ZK, Rittenhouse DR, Bibi S
The CMS State Innovation Models Initiative and improved health information technology and care management capabilities of physician practices.
The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' (CMS) State Innovation Models (SIMs) initiative funded 17 states to implement health care payment and delivery system reforms to improve health system performance. The authors investigated whether SIM improved health information technology (HIT) and care management capabilities of physician practices. They found that the CMS SIM Initiative did not accelerate the adoption of ten foundational physician practice capabilities beyond national trends.
AHRQ-funded; HS024075.
Citation: Kandel ZK, Rittenhouse DR, Bibi S .
The CMS State Innovation Models Initiative and improved health information technology and care management capabilities of physician practices.
Med Care Res Rev 2021 Aug;78(4):350-60. doi: 10.1177/1077558719901217..
Keywords: Health Information Technology (HIT), Healthcare Delivery, Payment, Health Systems
Kimmey L, Furukawa MF, Jones DJ
AHRQ Author: Furukawa MF
Geographic variation in the consolidation of physicians into health systems, 2016-18.
The authors asked the following questions: To what extent does consolidation of physicians into vertically integrated health systems vary across markets, and how did that change from 2016 to 2018? In this article, they used AHRQ data on health systems and commercial data on physician-system affiliation to describe metropolitan statistical area-level physician consolidation and to identify differences by region and metropolitan statistical area size.
AHRQ-authored; AHRQ-funded; 290201600001C.
Citation: Kimmey L, Furukawa MF, Jones DJ .
Geographic variation in the consolidation of physicians into health systems, 2016-18.
Health Aff 2021 Jan;40(1):165-69. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2020.00812..
Keywords: Health Systems, Provider: Physician, Provider, Healthcare Delivery
Scanlon DP, Harvey JB, Wolf LJ
Are health systems redesigning how health care is delivered?
The purpose of this study was to explore why and how health systems are engaging in care delivery redesign (CDR)-defined as the variety of tools and organizational change processes health systems use to pursue the Triple Aim. The investigators concluded that the ability to validly and reliably measure CDR activities-particularly across varying organizational contexts and markets-was currently limited but is key to better understanding CDR's impact on intended outcomes, which is important for guiding both health system decision making and policy making.
AHRQ-funded; HS024067.
Citation: Scanlon DP, Harvey JB, Wolf LJ .
Are health systems redesigning how health care is delivered?
Health Serv Res 2020 Dec;55(Suppl 3):1129-43. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13585..
Keywords: Health Systems, Healthcare Delivery
Graves JA, Nshuti L, Everson J
Breadth and exclusivity of hospital and physician networks in US insurance markets.
The goal of this study was to quantify network breadth and overlap among primary care physician (PCP), cardiology, and general acute care hospital networks for employer-based (large group and small group), individually purchased (marketplace), Medicare Advantage (MA), and Medicaid managed care (MMC) plans. The main outcomes measured were percentage of in-network physicians and/or hospitals within a 60-minute drive from a hypothetical patient in a given zip code (breadth), and the number of physicians and/or hospitals within each network that overlapped with other insurers' networks, expressed as a percentage of the total possible number of shared connections (exclusivity). Networks were categorized by network breadth size and analyzed by insurance type, state, and insurance, physician, and/or hospital market concentration level, as measured by the Hirschman-Herfindahl index. Markets with concentrated primary care and insurance markets had the broadest and least exclusive primary care networks among large-group commercial plans. Markets with the least concentration had the narrowest and most exclusive networks. Rising levels of insurer and market concentration were associated with broader and less exclusive healthcare networks. The authors suggest that this means that patients could switch to a lower-cost, narrow network plan without losing-in-network coverage to their PCP.
AHRQ-funded; HS025976; HS026395.
Citation: Graves JA, Nshuti L, Everson J .
Breadth and exclusivity of hospital and physician networks in US insurance markets.
JAMA Netw Open 2020 Dec;3(12):e2029419. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.29419..
Keywords: Health Insurance, Learning Health Systems, Health Systems, Primary Care, Hospitals, Healthcare Delivery
Singer SJ, Sinaiko AD, Tietschert MV
Care integration within and outside health system boundaries.
The purpose of this study was to examine care integration-efforts to unify disparate parts of health care organizations to generate synergy across activities occurring within and between them-to understand whether and at which organizational level health systems impact care quality and staff experience. The investigators concluded that measures of clinical process integration related to higher staff ratings of quality and experience.
AHRQ-funded; HS024067.
Citation: Singer SJ, Sinaiko AD, Tietschert MV .
Care integration within and outside health system boundaries.
Health Serv Res 2020 Dec;55(Suppl 3):1033-48. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13578..
Keywords: Health Systems, Healthcare Delivery, Health Services Research (HSR), Research Methodologies
Kranz AM, DeYoreo M, shete-Roesler B
Health system affiliation of physician organizations and quality of care for Medicare beneficiaries who have high needs.
The goal of this study was to test the hypothesis that health systems provide better care to patients with high needs compared to nonaffiliated physician organizations (POs). The 2015 Medicare Data on Provider Practice and Specialty linked physicians’ database was linked to POs Medicare Provider Enrollment, Chain, and Ownership System (PECOS) and IRS Form 990 data to identify health system affiliations. Among 2,323,301 beneficiaries with high needs, 52.3% received care from system-affiliated practices. The emergency department (ED) visit rate was statistically significantly different in system-affiliated POs and nonaffiliated POs. There were small differences for the remaining five of six quality measures examined: continuity of care, follow-up visits, all-cause readmissions, and ambulatory care-sensitive hospitalizations. Within systems there was substantial variation for rates of continuity of care and follow-up after ED visits.
AHRQ-funded; HS024067.
Citation: Kranz AM, DeYoreo M, shete-Roesler B .
Health system affiliation of physician organizations and quality of care for Medicare beneficiaries who have high needs.
Health Serv Res 2020 Dec;55(Suppl 3):1118-28. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13570..
Keywords: Health Systems, Medicare, Quality of Care, Healthcare Delivery
Machta RM, Reschovsky JD, Jones DJ
AHRQ Author: Furukawa MF
Health system integration with physician specialties varies across markets and system types.
Data from the AHRQ Compendium of US Health Systems and the IQVIA OneKey database was used to examine the change from 2016 to 2018 in the percentage of physicians in systems, focusing on primary care and the 10 most numerous non-hospital based specialties across 382 metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs) in the US. The authors also categorized systems by ownership, mission, and payment program participation and examined how these characteristics were related to their patterns of physician integration in 2018. Findings were that specialists with lucrative hospital services were the most commonly integrated with systems, including hematology-oncology, cardiology, and general surgery. High market concentration by insurers and hospital-systems was associated with lower rates of physician integration. In addition, systems with academic medical centers (AMCs) and publicly owned systems unrelated to the physicians’ potential contribution to hospital revenue, and investor-owned systems demonstrated more limited physician integration.
AHRQ-authored; AHRQ-funded; 290201600001C.
Citation: Machta RM, Reschovsky JD, Jones DJ .
Health system integration with physician specialties varies across markets and system types.
Health Serv Res 2020 Dec;55(Suppl 3):1062-72. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13584..
Keywords: Health Systems, Healthcare Delivery, Primary Care
Colla C, Yang W, Mainor AJ
Organizational integration, practice capabilities, and outcomes in clinically complex Medicare beneficiaries.
This study examines the association between clinical integration and financial integration, quality-focused care delivery processes, and beneficiary utilization and outcomes. Data was used from multiphysician practices in the 2017-2018 National Survey of Healthcare Organizations and Systems and 2017 Medicare claims data. Out of 1.6M fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries aged 66 or older attributed to 2113 practices, 414,209 were considered clinically complex (frailty or 2 or more chronic conditions). Financial and clinical integration were weakly correlated. Clinical integration was significantly associated with greater adoption of quality-focused care delivery processes, while financial integration was associated with the opposite. Integration was not associated with reduced utilization or better beneficiary-level health-related outcomes, but both integration types were associated with lower spending.
AHRQ-funded; HS024075.
Citation: Colla C, Yang W, Mainor AJ .
Organizational integration, practice capabilities, and outcomes in clinically complex Medicare beneficiaries.
Health Serv Res 2020 Dec;55(Suppl 3):1085-97. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13580..
Keywords: Medicare, Health Systems, Healthcare Delivery
Ridgely MS, Buttorff C, Wolf L
The importance of understanding and measuring health system structural, functional, and clinical integration.
In this study, the authors explored if there were ways to characterize health systems-not already revealed by secondary data-that could provide new insights into differences in health system performance. The investigators sought to collect rich qualitative data to reveal whether and to what extent health systems varied in important ways across dimensions of structural, functional, and clinical integration.
AHRQ-funded; HS024067.
Citation: Ridgely MS, Buttorff C, Wolf L .
The importance of understanding and measuring health system structural, functional, and clinical integration.
Health Serv Res 2020 Dec;55(Suppl 3):1049-61. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13582..
Keywords: Health Systems, Healthcare Delivery
Harvey JB, Vanderbrink J, Mahmud Y
Understanding how health systems facilitate primary care redesign.
The objectives of this study were to understand how health systems are facilitating primary care redesign (PCR), examine the PCR initiatives taking place within systems, and identify barriers to this work. A sample of 24 health systems in 4 states was used to identify how system leaders define and implement initiatives to redesign primary care delivery and identify challenges. Codes based on the theoretical PCR literature was used and researchers also created new codes. Semi-structured telephone interviews with 162 system executives and physician organization leaders from 24 systems were conducted. Initiatives to redesign the delivery of primary care were described by leaders, but many were still in the early stages. Motivating factors for team-based care included improvement efficiency and enhancing clinician job satisfaction. Changes in payment and risk assumption as well as community needs were commonly cited as motivators for population health management and care coordination. Challenges health systems face in redesigning primary included return on investment and slower than anticipated rate in moving from fee-for-service to value-based payment.
AHRQ-funded; HS024067.
Citation: Harvey JB, Vanderbrink J, Mahmud Y .
Understanding how health systems facilitate primary care redesign.
Health Serv Res 2020 Dec;55(Suppl 3):1144-54. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13576..
Keywords: Health Systems, Primary Care: Models of Care, Primary Care, Healthcare Delivery
Agniel D, Haviland A, Shekelle P
Distinguishing high-performing health systems using a composite of publicly reported measures of ambulatory care.
The purpose of this study was to develop and evaluate a measure that ranks health care systems by ambulatory care quality. The authors concluded that their measure, using publicly reported data to produce valid, reliable, and stable ranks of ambulatory care quality for health care systems in Minnesota and California, could also be used in other applications.
AHRQ-funded; HS024067.
Citation: Agniel D, Haviland A, Shekelle P .
Distinguishing high-performing health systems using a composite of publicly reported measures of ambulatory care.
Ann Intern Med 2020 Nov 17;173(10):791-98. doi: 10.7326/m20-0718..
Keywords: Health Systems, Ambulatory Care and Surgery, Quality Indicators (QIs), Quality Measures, Quality of Care, Provider Performance, Healthcare Delivery
Fisher ES, Shortell SM, O'Malley AJ
Financial integration's impact on care delivery and payment reforms: a survey of hospitals and physician practices. Health Aff 2020 Aug;39(8):1302-11. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.01813.
This study looked at whether financial integration of hospitals and physician practices was associated with greater quality. A total of 739 hospitals and 2,189 physician practices were included in the nationally representative survey. They were stratified by whether they were independent or owned by complex systems, simple systems, or medical groups. Nine scales were used to measure the level of adoption of diverse, quality-focused care delivery and payment reforms. While quality scores favored financially integrated systems for 4 of 9 hospital measures and one of 9 practice measures, none of them favored complex systems. Better quality was generally not associated with greater financial integration.
AHRQ-funded; U19 HS024075.
Citation: Fisher ES, Shortell SM, O'Malley AJ .
Financial integration's impact on care delivery and payment reforms: a survey of hospitals and physician practices. Health Aff 2020 Aug;39(8):1302-11. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.01813.
Health Aff 2020 Aug;39(8):1302-11. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.01813..
Keywords: Healthcare Delivery, Payment, Hospitals, Health Systems, Quality of Care
Furukawa MF, Machta RM, Barrett KA
AHRQ Author: Furukawa MF
Landscape of health systems in the United States.
This paper describes AHRQ’s development of the Compendium of U.S. Health Systems to help identify and describe health systems. This data resource supports research on comparative health system performance. The authors describe the methods used to create the compendium and create a picture of vertical integration. They identified 626 health systems in 2016, which accounted for 70% of nonfederal general acute care hospitals. The systems varied by key structural attributes, including size, ownership, and geographic prevalence.
AHRQ-authored; AHRQ-funded; 290201600001C.
Citation: Furukawa MF, Machta RM, Barrett KA .
Landscape of health systems in the United States.
Med Care Res Rev 2020 Aug;77(4):357-66. doi: 10.1177/1077558718823130..
Keywords: Health Systems, Healthcare Delivery, Hospitals
Nguyen AM, Johnson CE, Wood SJ
The contribution of physician-system integrating structure to select health system outcomes.
Physician groups are increasingly being vertically integrated with hospitals and health systems; yet, the evidence on the impact of physician-system integration on health system outcomes is mixed. The objective of this mixed-methods study was to examine the impact of increased physician-system integration on select health system outcomes.
AHRQ-funded; HS024895.
Citation: Nguyen AM, Johnson CE, Wood SJ .
The contribution of physician-system integrating structure to select health system outcomes.
J Ambul Care Manage 2020 Jul/Sep;43(3):237-56. doi: 10.1097/jac.0000000000000331..
Keywords: Health Systems, Healthcare Delivery, Outcomes
Sutherland BL, Pecanac K, Bartels CM
Expect delays: poor connections between rural and urban health systems challenge
Rural Americans with diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) face a 50% increased risk of major amputation compared to their urban counterparts. In this study, the investigators sought to identify health system barriers contributing to this disparity. The investigators concluded that poor connections across rural and urban healthcare systems were described as the primary health system barrier driving the rural disparity in major amputations.
AHRQ-funded; HS026279.
Citation: Sutherland BL, Pecanac K, Bartels CM .
Expect delays: poor connections between rural and urban health systems challenge
J Foot Ankle Res 2020 Jun 16;13(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s13047-020-00395-y..
Keywords: Rural Health, Health Systems, Disparities, Diabetes, Chronic Conditions, Healthcare Delivery
Dukhanin V, Feeser S, Berkowitz SA
Who represents me? A patient-derived model of patient engagement via patient and family advisory councils (PFACs).
This study examined what expectations would be from patients who are not patient and family advisory council (PFAC) members of PFACs. Patients and caregivers from the Johns Hopkins Medical Alliance for Patients, LLC were recruited in 2014. This Medicare accountable care organization has an established PFAC, the Beneficiary Advisory Council. Five focus groups with 42 patients and caregivers participated. Most participants were not aware of PFACs and wanted to know more about representation, what they could do and expected that patients could communicate with PFACs if desired.
AHRQ-funded; HS023684.
Citation: Dukhanin V, Feeser S, Berkowitz SA .
Who represents me? A patient-derived model of patient engagement via patient and family advisory councils (PFACs).
Health Expect 2020 Feb;23(1):148-58. doi: 10.1111/hex.12983..
Keywords: Patient and Family Engagement, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Healthcare Delivery, Health Systems
Heeringa J, Mutti A, Furukawa MF
AHRQ Author: Furukawa MF
Horizontal and vertical integration of health care providers: a framework for understanding various provider organizational structures.
The authors conducted a narrative review of 10 years of literature to identify definitional components of key organizational structures in the United States. They found that U.S. policymakers seek to promote provider integration and coordination. They conclude that emerging evidence suggested that organizational structures, composition, and other characteristics influence cost and quality performance. They recommend future research to examine systematically the role of organizational structure in cost and quality outcomes.
AHRQ-authored; AHRQ-funded.
Citation: Heeringa J, Mutti A, Furukawa MF .
Horizontal and vertical integration of health care providers: a framework for understanding various provider organizational structures.
Int J Integr Care 2020 Jan 20;20(1):2. doi: 10.5334/ijic.4635.
.
.
Keywords: Health Systems, Healthcare Delivery, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Care Coordination, Organizational Change, Policy
Guise JM, Reid E, Fiordalisi CV
AHRQ Author: Borsky A, Chang S
AHRQ series on improving translation of evidence: progress and promise in supporting learning health systems.
The authors discuss the articles in the AHRQ EPC series published in this journal over the past six months. They state that satisfaction, care, and costs would all improve if health care delivery were as efficient and effective as possible given current knowledge. They conclude that millions of health decisions must be made by clinicians, patients, and health care systems, and they believe better decisions will be made with evidence.
AHRQ-authored; AHRQ-funded; 290201700003C.
Citation: Guise JM, Reid E, Fiordalisi CV .
AHRQ series on improving translation of evidence: progress and promise in supporting learning health systems.
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2020 Jan;46(1):51-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2019.10.008..
Keywords: Implementation, Evidence-Based Practice, Learning Health Systems, Health Systems, Healthcare Delivery, Shared Decision Making