National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 5 of 5 Research Studies DisplayedGuise JM, Chang C, Butler M
AHRQ Author: Chang C
AHRQ series on complex intervention systematic reviews-paper 1: an introduction to a series of articles that provide guidance and tools for reviews of complex interventions.
The seven articles in this series reflect and distill the discussions from the in-person meeting and follow-up workgroups on tools and approaches to systematic reviews of complex interventions. The first three articles address how systematic reviews for complex interventions are conceptualized and operationalized for the protocol. The next two articles discuss how to choose appropriate analytic methods to implement analyses of complex interventions. The final two articles describe proposed reporting elements for systematic reviews of complex interventions.
AHRQ-authored; AHRQ-funded; 290201200004C; 290201200016I; 290201500011I.
Citation: Guise JM, Chang C, Butler M .
AHRQ series on complex intervention systematic reviews-paper 1: an introduction to a series of articles that provide guidance and tools for reviews of complex interventions.
J Clin Epidemiol 2017 Oct;90:6-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.06.011.
.
.
Keywords: Data, Evidence-Based Practice, Guidelines, Research Methodologies
Kelly MP, Noyes J, Kane RL
AHRQ Author: Chang C
AHRQ series on complex intervention systematic reviews-paper 2: defining complexity, formulating scope, and questions.
This paper builds on concepts introduced in paper 1 of this series. It describes the methodological, practical, and philosophical challenges and potential approaches for formulating the questions and scope of systematic reviews of complex interventions. Furthermore, it discusses the use of theory to help organize reviews of complex interventions.
AHRQ-authored; AHRQ-funded; 290-2012-00004-C; 290-2015-00008I; 290-2015-00011I.
Citation: Kelly MP, Noyes J, Kane RL .
AHRQ series on complex intervention systematic reviews-paper 2: defining complexity, formulating scope, and questions.
J Clin Epidemiol 2017 Oct;90:11-18. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.06.012.
.
.
Keywords: Data, Evidence-Based Practice, Guidelines, Research Methodologies
Viswanathan M, McPheeters ML, Murad MH
AHRQ series on complex intervention systematic reviews-paper 4: selecting analytic approaches.
This article addresses the uncertainty that systematic reviewers face in selecting methods for reviews of complex interventions. Specifically, it lays out parameters for systematic reviewers to consider when selecting analytic approaches that best answer the questions at hand and suggests analytic techniques that may be appropriate in different circumstances.
AHRQ-funded; 290201200004C.
Citation: Viswanathan M, McPheeters ML, Murad MH .
AHRQ series on complex intervention systematic reviews-paper 4: selecting analytic approaches.
J Clin Epidemiol 2017 Oct;90:28-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.06.014.
.
.
Keywords: Data, Evidence-Based Practice, Guidelines, Research Methodologies
Guise JM, Butler M, Chang C
AHRQ Author: Chang C
AHRQ series on complex intervention systematic reviews-paper 7: PRISMA-CI elaboration and explanation.
The Complex Interventions Methods Workgroup developed an extension to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses for Complex Interventions (PRISMA-CI). Following the guidance for Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis extensions, this Explanation and Elaboration (EE) document accompanies the PRISMA-CI checklist to promote consistency in reporting of systematic reviews of complex interventions.
AHRQ-authored; AHRQ-funded; 290201200004C; 290201200016I; 290201500011I.
Citation: Guise JM, Butler M, Chang C .
AHRQ series on complex intervention systematic reviews-paper 7: PRISMA-CI elaboration and explanation.
J Clin Epidemiol 2017 Oct;90:51-58. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.06.017.
.
.
Keywords: Data, Evidence-Based Practice, Guidelines, Research Methodologies
Burda BU, Holmer HK, Norris SL
Limitations of A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) and suggestions for improvement.
A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) is a commonly used tool to assess the quality of systematic reviews; however, modifications are needed to improve its usability, reliability, and validity. In this commentary, the authors summarize their experience and the experiences of others who have used AMSTAR and provide suggestions for its improvement.
AHRQ-funded; HS018500.
Citation: Burda BU, Holmer HK, Norris SL .
Limitations of A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) and suggestions for improvement.
Syst Rev 2016 Apr 12;5:58. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0237-1.
.
.
Keywords: Research Methodologies, Data, Evidence-Based Practice, Guidelines, Quality Measures