National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies Date
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 2 of 2 Research Studies DisplayedHenriksen K, Brady J
AHRQ Author: Henriksen K, Brady J
The pursuit of better diagnostic performance: a human factors perspective.
Improving diagnostic performance is increasingly recognised as a multifaceted challenge. This paper addresses a few of these challenges, including questions that focus on who owns the problem, treating cognitive and system shortcomings as separate issues, why knowledge in the head is not enough, and what we are learning from health information technology and the use of checklists. The authors propose a systems engineering approach making use of rapid-cycle prototyping and simulation, and they call for the formation of substantive partnerships with those in disciplines beyond the clinical domain.
AHRQ-authored.
Citation: Henriksen K, Brady J .
The pursuit of better diagnostic performance: a human factors perspective.
BMJ Qual Saf 2013 Oct;22 Suppl 2:ii1-ii5. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2013-001827.
.
.
Keywords: Diagnostic Safety and Quality, Health Information Technology (HIT), Medical Errors, Health Information Technology (HIT), Quality Improvement
Dahabreh IJ, Chung M, Kitsios GD
Survey of the methods and reporting practices in published meta-analyses of test performance: 1987 to 2009.
The researchers performed a survey of meta-analyses of test performance to describe the evolution in their methods and reporting. They found that the most common clinical areas were cardiovascular disease and oncology, while the most common test categories were imaging and biomarker tests. They concluded that the methods employed in meta-analyses of test performance have improved with the introduction of quality assessment checklists and the development of more sophisticated statistical methods.
AHRQ-funded; 290200710055I; HS013328.
Citation: Dahabreh IJ, Chung M, Kitsios GD .
Survey of the methods and reporting practices in published meta-analyses of test performance: 1987 to 2009.
Res Synth Methods 2013 Sep;4(3):242-55. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1083.
.
.
Keywords: Comparative Effectiveness, Diagnostic Safety and Quality, Research Methodologies